Skip Navigation Links.
advertisement
Printer Particles Pose Risk
BRISBANE, Australia, July 31, 2007 -- Workers could face a health threat -- in some cases, on par to that of cigarette smoking -- from office laser printers that emit large amounts of tiny particles into the air. Potential effects range from respiratory irritation to effects on the cardiovascular system and cancer, said Professor Lidia Morawska from the Queensland University of Technology, as reported in Australia's ABC Science Online.

Morawska, director of the International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, said the ultrafine particles, when inhaled, can travel to the deepest parts of the respiratory tract and then enter the bloodstream.

The researchers do not know the chemical makeup of the particles and how they are released, but they recommend good office ventilation to minimize chances of particles entering the airways.

The researchers classified 17 of the 62 printers they tested as "high particle emitters." Under experimental conditions, one printer released particles at a rate comparable to the particle emissions from cigarette smoking, Morowska said, but 37 of the printers were nonemitters, according to the news report. The study found printers emitted more particles when the toner cartridge was new and when printing images and graphics, as these require greater amounts of toner, it said.

Morawska and her colleagues will publish their results online later this week in the American Chemical Society journal Environmental Science & Technology.

The findings were reportedly made by chance while Morawska's team was investigating the efficiency of ventilation in protecting office workers from outdoor pollution. They tested a large open-plan office in the Brisbane central business district, surrounded by busy roads and about 120 meters (.074 miles) from a freeway. Morawska said they didn't expect to find anything from indoor sources but soon discovered that the indoor sources of pollution were far higher than the outdoor ones.

Their study showed that average particle number concentration inside the test office is five times higher during working hours than nonworking hours. At its highest levels, indoor particle concentration was about three times higher than the outdoor rate.

In offices with poor ventilation, higher concentrations of particles can "prevail for the whole day" and the health risks will be "quite high" for workers who spend long periods in the office, according to the news report. 

The research team is calling on governments to consider regulating emission levels from laser printers. But Morawska said more research is first needed into the chemical makeup of the emissions and how the particles are released. Her paper includes a list of the brands and models studied and their rating by amount of particles emitted. A total of 12 models of Hewlett Packard printers and one Toshiba printer are listed as high emitters of tiny particles.

Morawska said until governments move to regulate printer emissions, office managers should consider buying printers that are classified as low emitters and to locate printers where the air flow doesn't distribute the particles to the entireoffice.

For more information, visit: www.qut.edu.au


Skip Navigation Links.

Let's face it, laser printers have been filling up our landfills and gobbling up hordes of power for ages. Now that we find out they could be potentially dangerous to our health it is time we have a serious alternative.

Solid ink technology has been around for years but just recently has improved to the point where it offers considerable advantages over laser. Solid ink technology from Xerox offers greater speed, quality, lower cost per print, lower maintenance cost, lower power consumption, is environmentally safe to use and produces no harmful particles like laser.

FreePrinters.com (http://www.FreePrinters.com) is pleased to offer the latest in Solid ink printer technology in the latest free printer programs that also include free on-site service.

It's time to make a change. Why pay for a printer when you can get it for free? http://www.FreePrinters.com

We had a Xerox Phaser 8400. The printouts look great the first day. However, it is a kind of greasy stuff which makes the colours, like soap. On the long turn, pages look wiped off after some time, especially if the paper surface is subject to rubbing (like a booklet which is used a lot).

Not to put down on the risk of nano-particles - but the Xerox is not a real alternative if it comes to great printouts.

Mr. Dwalters - Please back up your data about power consumption of inkjets verses the solid ink printers. In what form is the solid ink? Give us a comparison of sizes or volumes of the ink resorvoirs as well.

Thanks

phoward

Solid Ink printers such as the Xerox Phaser 8560 may be a solution for a large work groups who prints hundreds of color prints/images per day, but for small work groups, or groups that print mostly black and white, they are not ideal - according to reviews and users. The 8560 consumes 45W in power save mode, since it needs to keep the wax like ink melted and hot. If you turn the unit off - I understand the hot ink is dumped, and the expensive Xerox ink is consumed rapidly.