For Pixels, Size Matters
Albert Theuwissen
In the rat race for ever-higher pixel counts for the digital still camera market, it is clear that, if the chip size must remain constant, then "more pixels" inherently means "smaller pixels."
The driving force to keep the silicon area of the sensor as small as possible is the cost of the sensor chip: Extra silicon costs quite a bit of money. A larger chip size also requires a larger and more costly lens, extra space on a printed circuit board and a larger volume for the camera body. Smaller pixels are the key to producing higher-resolution sensors on the same silicon area -- or to reducing chip size without affecting resolution.
Unfortunately, there are trade-offs in making these improvements and, in this case, the trade-off is the overall performance of the pixels. Irrespective of the sensor technology used -- interline-transfer, frame-transfer or full-frame CCD; or passive- or active-pixel CMOS -- smaller pixels will deteriorate performance...
Meet the author
Albert Theuwissen is R&D manager at Philips Semiconductors Image Sensors in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. He authored the textbook
Solid-State Imaging with Charge-Coupled Devices.
LATEST NEWS
- Exail Signs LLNL Contract, Partners with Eelume
Apr 26, 2024
- Menlo Moves U.S. HQ: Week in Brief: 4/26/2024
Apr 26, 2024
- Optofluidics Platform Keys Label-, Amplification-Free Rapid Diagnostic Tool
Apr 25, 2024
- DUV Lasers Made with Nonlinear Crystals Enhance Lithography Performance
Apr 25, 2024
- Teledyne e2v, Airy3D Collaborate on 3D Vision Solutions
Apr 24, 2024
- One-Step Hologram Generation Speeds 3D Display Creation
Apr 24, 2024
- Innovation Award Winners for Laser Technology Honored in Aachen
Apr 23, 2024
- Intech 2024: AI Arrives on the Shop Floor
Apr 22, 2024