Thermal Imaging Takes the Guesswork Out of Feeder Cattle Sizing
In the feeder cattle industry, sizing considerations are extremely important. Sending animals to slaughter that are not the correct size can be a costly mistake for a producer, yielding lower-quality meat that consequently demands a lower price on the market. Until recently, sizing processes have been limited in their ability to gauge size effectively, but thermal imaging technology offers a means to overcome these limitations.
More than an animal's weight is necessary to predict whether it will merit a grade of "Choice" -- the most popular at retail meat counters -- from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Feeder cattle also must be evaluated according to the size of their physical frame. According to the Training Manual for USDA Standards for Grading Slaughter Animals, feeder cattle grades are determined by differences in frame size and muscle thickness. With three recognized grades of frame size and four of muscle thickness, producers must determine which of the 12 combinations describes a given animal before they can deduce that it has reached the optimal weight for slaughter.
Thermal imaging enables a producer of feeder cattle to perform automated "slaughterability" assessments that are not subject to the edge-definition errors caused by dust and variation in animal color that can affect visible-light systems in this application.
A technologically sophisticated feeder cattle producer may conduct the "slaughterability" assessment process by sending animals through a chute and photographing them from above with a CCTV or visible-light camera that is connected to a computer system. The system's machine vision software examines the image of the animal to determine its edge definition. By measuring the area inside the defined edges, the software can help measure the animal's mass and determine whether it will meet USDA standards.
There are, however, practical problems with such a setup. Because much of the sizing is performed in an outdoor environment, the dust that is kicked up by the cattle interferes with the visible-light camera system's ability to perform the edge definition effectively. In addition, the different colors on the cattle, some of which are similar to that of the ground, can make it difficult for visible-light systems to determine where an animal begins and the background ends. Some producers have tried to fix these problems by increasing the illumination on the cattle while they are being photographed. However, the extra light can make the animals more nervous, causing them to move about all the more and to stir up additional dust.
One producer solved the problems by using thermal imaging cameras. Thermal imaging technology operates in the 7- to 14-µm wavelength range, so it is able to "see" through the dust. In addition, by measuring and displaying thermal characteristics, it is easy for the software to distinguish an animal from the background -- no matter the color of the animal or ground. Using a thermal camera, the system designer acquired consistent, reliable images, enabling the machine vision software to perform more accurate edge-definition measurements.
Although thermal systems may cost more than those that incorporate visible-light cameras, they can help producers avoid the expense of inaccurate sizing and grading. This means that the thermal imaging camera systems give a high return on investment.
MORE FROM PHOTONICS MEDIA