Close

Search

Search Menu
Photonics Media Photonics Buyers' Guide Photonics EDU Photonics Spectra BioPhotonics EuroPhotonics Industrial Photonics Photonics Showcase Photonics ProdSpec Photonics Handbook
More News
SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT
2016 Photonics Buyers' Guide Clearance! – Use Coupon Code FC16 to save 60%!
share
Email Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Comments

New patent law favors “first to file”

BioPhotonics
Oct 2011

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama last month signed the most significant reform of US patent law since 1836 and the first major changes to the system since 1952 – with big implications for biomedical and life sciences technologies.

“This much-needed reform will speed up the patent process,” Obama said, “so that innovators and entrepreneurs can turn a new invention into a business as quickly as possible.”

On stage with a bipartisan group of legislators, the president signed the act into law at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Alexandria, Va. Thomas Jefferson was the first official to issue US patents.

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act changes the patent application system from one that awards patents to the “first to invent” to one that favors the “first inventor to file.” The White House said it will help businesses, inventors and entrepreneurs by implementing a “fast track” option for patent processing, shortening the average three-year wait time at the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to 12 months. It also will add resources to reduce the current backlog of 1.2 million applications (there are almost 90,000 patents awaiting review from California alone) and will tighten standards for issuing patents.

Global compliance

The new law brings the US into compliance with the patent system used by the rest of the world, which will make it easier for American inventors to protect their intellectual property abroad, according to its supporters. The law also expands the PTO’s resources by letting it retain the fees it collects, enabling it to modernize its operations.

“Many key industries in which the United States leads, such as biotechnology, medical devices, telecommunications, the Internet and advanced manufacturing, depend on a strong and healthy intellectual property system,” said Quentin Palfrey, senior adviser to the chief technology officer for jobs and competitiveness in the White House Office of Science & Technology, in a White House blog.

Officials at Duke University in Durham, N.C., hailed the bill’s passage, saying it makes it easier for university researchers to move innovations into the marketplace where they might create new industries and jobs.

Duke researchers filed 189 applications and were issued 91 patents in fiscal 2010. The number of applications has roughly doubled over the past five years, according to campus officials, but the number of those approved has stayed about the same, reflecting delays in the federal approval process.

“We hope this change will speed things up at the patent office, where long backlogs have been a real problem, but it makes it super important to get things filed promptly,” said Rose Ritts, director of Duke’s Office of Licensing & Ventures. “The law also changes the rules about what sort of prior disclosure about an idea limits an inventor’s ability to get a patent.”

Small-business opposition

In March, a number of organizations representing small businesses, startup entrepreneurs, independent inventors and technical professionals, including the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the National Small Business Association and the US Business and Industry Council, sent a group letter to the House of Representatives opposing the act.

One of the specific objections they cited was replacement of the old law’s one-year grace period – which provided small companies and early-stage investors with the time to refine their ideas while searching for the funding required to patent, develop and commercialize them – with one that sets a much shorter set of deadlines for filing patent applications.

“The act provides a grace period only if the inventor publishes a disclosure of the invention. However, very few startups publicly disclose their invention right after they make them,” the organizations wrote in a joint statement. “The act proposes features that return to an antiquated system that provides no grace period for nondisclosing public-use and on-sale activity, ignoring inventors’ need to work and market their inventions before the deadline for patenting.

“This grace period is a key reason that the US patent system is the best in the world at generating innovation, at building industries from computers to biotech to blossom here as nowhere else. The change in grace period has features that favor foreign and multinational firms over American startup firms that often seek an initial foothold in US domestic markets. The bill favors market incumbents over new entrants with disruptive new technologies.”

The statement also noted that Canada’s switch from first to invent to first to file in 1989 did not spur its inventors to additional research-and-development efforts, and it also appeared unfavorable to independent inventors and small businesses, channeling inventive activity toward large corporations.

“There are some who think this bill hurts small business and independent inventors, but they are wrong,” said Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, in a statement on the House floor in June in support of the bill. “It ensures that independent inventors are able to compete with larger companies both here and abroad.

“American inventors seeking protection here in the United States will have taken the first step toward protecting their patent rights around the world.”

For more information on the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, visit www.uspto.gov or www.whitehouse.gov.


Comments
Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy About Us Contact Us
back to top

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn YouTube RSS
©2016 Photonics Media
x Subscribe to BioPhotonics magazine - FREE!